Summary: A Delhi court, commanded by Additional Sessions Court Sameer Bajpai, disregarded an acting bond plea on Tuesday by JNU trainee protestor Umar Khalid, who looked for bond to take care of his ailing mommy and attend his uncle’s post-death routines.
Bottom line
- Umar Khalid is booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for apparently being a “mastermind” of the 2020 Delhi riots.
- The 2020 troubles in northeast Delhi led to 53 fatalities and more than 700 individuals being wounded.
- The troubles happened during widespread objections against the Citizenship (Change) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
- The Supreme Court recently criticised its January 5 judgment denying bond to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the alleged larger conspiracy theory case connected to the troubles.
- A High court bench specified that “bond is the regulation and prison is an exception” even in UAPA prosecutions, referencing Article 21 and anticipation of virtue.
What This Indicates
This decision implies Umar Khalid will certainly continue to be captive while encountering costs under UAPA, a legislation frequently criticised for its rigorous bond stipulations. The Supreme Court’s recent observations offer a twinkle of hope that extended apprehension without trial can be a consider granting bail, also under UAPA.
Source: www.hindustantimes.com