Pavel Durov, ceo of Telegram, at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, on Tuesday,Feb 23, 2016.
Chris Ratcliffe|Bloomberg|Getty Images
The employer of messaging system Telegram stated late Thursday that bills versus him by France are “misguided,” in his initial public remarks because being apprehended in the nation almost 2 weeks back.
Pavel Durov, that started Telegram in 2013, was recently billed with allowing criminal task on the messaging application– consisting of circulation of kid porn, medication trafficking, and scams, and rejection to share details with authorities.
One of the fees– engineering in the management of an on-line system to allow an immoral purchase in an arranged gang– lugs an optimum fine of ten years’ jail time and a 500,000 euro ($555,833) great if somebody is condemned after test.
Durov, that has actually remained in France because his apprehension onAug 24, published a 5 million euro bond and stays under judicial guidance. He can not leave French area and needs to report two times once a week to a police headquarters, district attorneys stated recently.
In his initial public talk about the circumstance, Durov stated Thursday that France’s choice to restrain and bill him was based upon a “misguided approach.
“If a nation is miserable with a web solution, the well-known technique is to begin a lawsuit versus the solution itself,” Telegram’s CEO and founder said in a statement posted on his Telegram account.
“Using legislations from the pre-smartphone period to bill a chief executive officer with criminal activities dedicated by 3rd parties on the system he takes care of is an illinformed technique.”
“Building innovation is hard sufficient as it is. No trendsetter will certainly ever before develop brand-new devices if they recognize they can be directly delegated prospective misuse of those devices,” he added.
Durov said that he was interviewed by French police for four days after arriving in Paris from Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, last month.
“I was informed I might be directly in charge of other individuals’s prohibited use Telegram, since the French authorities really did not obtain actions from Telegram,” he said, adding this was “shocking” as Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to requests.
The social media platform had already been working with French authorities to “develop a hotline with Telegram to handle with the risk of terrorism in France,” its founder said. Durov, a citizen of the United Arab Emirates, added that he was a “regular visitor at the French consular office in Dubai.”
Prior to Durov’s arrival in France, there was speculation that he was due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Azerbaijan.
However, the Kremlin’s official spokesperson told the BBC last week that a meeting never took place.
The 39-year-old Russian-born billionaire has a net worth of about $15.5 billion, according to Forbes, making him the world’s 121st wealthiest person.
Telegram, the platform he co-founded, has been often marketed as an uncensored and neutral platform.
But this approach has courted controversy for the app, with numerous governments raising concerns that Telegram lacks sufficient content moderation controls to detect and remove illegal content.
Telegram is particularly popular in repressive regimes where usage of internet platforms is heavily restricted. It has also gained a reputation for being used by fraud gangs, drug dealers, and even designated terrorist organizations, which have previously used the service to claim responsibility for attacks.
For its part, Telegram has defended its moderation practices, saying last week that they were “within industry standards and constantly improving.”
Thanks everyone for your support and love!
Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram.This was surprising for several reasons:
- Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”.
- The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France.
- If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools.
Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue.
Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country. We’ve done it many times. When Russia demanded we hand over “encryption keys” to enable surveillance, we refused — and Telegram got banned in Russia. When Iran demanded we block channels of peaceful protesters, we refused — and Telegram got banned in Iran. We are prepared to leave markets that aren’t compatible with our principles, because we are not doing this for money. We are driven by the intention to bring good and defend the basic rights of people, particularly in places where these rights are violated.
All of that does not mean Telegram is perfect. Even the fact that authorities could be confused by where to send requests is something that we should improve. But the claims in some media that Telegram is some sort of anarchic paradise are absolutely untrue. We take down millions of harmful posts and channels every day. We publish daily transparency reports (like this or this ). We have direct hotlines with NGOs to process urgent moderation requests faster.
However, we hear voices saying that it’s not enough. Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform. That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon.
I hope that the events of August will result in making Telegram — and the social networking industry as a whole — safer and stronger. Thanks again for your love and memes
Source link
line (*) – video clip (*) lot (*) team (*) within market requirements and frequently enhancing. (*) ArticleBody-blockquote (*) EU address for police (*) security secrets (*) target =” _ space (*) noopener (*) target =” _ space (*) noopener (*) WildCardEmbed” > (*)
