Liz Kendall tells MPs Waspi ladies will not get compensation, regardless of ombudsman saying they need to
In March the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman revealed a report saying that the so-called Waspi ladies (Women Against State Pension Inequality) deserved compensation as a result of they didn’t get enough warning from the federal government about the truth that their state pension age was going up. It mentioned folks affected ought to be paid compensation, and that this might value as much as £10.5bn.
At the time the Conservatives, who had been then in authorities, and Labour, who had been anticipating to switch them inside months, refused to decide to accepting the advice. But the then authorities mentioned it could take time to think about the report correctly, and Labour additionally delay a definitive response.
In a press release to the Commons, Liz Kendall has now delivered the federal government’s formal response. And she has dominated out paying compensation.
She instructed MPs:
Given the overwhelming majority of ladies knew the state pension age was rising, the federal government doesn’t imagine paying a flat charge to all ladies at a price of as much as £10.5bn can be a good or proportionate use of taxpayers cash, not least when the earlier authorities didn’t put aside a single penny for any compensation scheme, and after they left us a £22bn within the public funds.
This has been an especially tough choice to take, however we imagine it’s the proper plan of action, and we’re decided to study all the teachings to make sure one of these maladministration by no means occurs once more.
Key occasions
Starmer says he has to guard taxpayers, as he defends not paying compensationt to Waspi ladies
Keir Starmer has mentioned he accepts that Waspi ladies will probably be sad with the federal government’s choice to not pay them compensation.
In an interview with broadcasters in Estonia, requested if he understood the anger of these affected, Starmer replied:
I do perceive their considerations. The ombudsman’s findings had been clear in relation to maladministration, but additionally clear in regards to the lack of direct monetary injustice, because the ombudsman noticed it. That’s why we’ve taken the choice that we’ve taken.
But I do perceive, in fact, the priority of the Waspi ladies.
But additionally I’ve to bear in mind whether or not it’s proper for the time being to impose an extra burden on the taxpayer, which is what it could be.
Tories says it’s Labour’s choice to not compensate Waspi ladies ‘and they should personal it’
The final Conservative authorities didn’t give any indication that it was more likely to settle for the ombudsman’s suggestions if it gained the election and, in her response to Liz Kendall, Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, didn’t argue that the federal government ought to have taken another choice.
But she did say this was now Labour’s choice, they usually needed to “own it”. In the Commons she instructed MPs:
No doubt campaigners will observe the federal government’s apology for the selections made between 2005 and 2007 which led to a 28-month delay in sending out letters which the ombudsman recognized as maladministration however let’s be clear, the choice to supply no compensation is the federal government’s choice and they should personal it.
I’m not going to allow them to get away with saying that that is due to a fictional black gap within the public funds. The nation’s monetary place now’s a results of their political decisions.
They shouldn’t attempt to dodge duty by suggesting to waspi ladies that if instances had been totally different, they may have come to a unique conclusion.
Waspi marketing campaign says authorities’s choice ‘weird and completely unjustified’
Waspi, the Women Against State Pension Inequality marketing campaign, has condemned the federal government’s choice as “totally unjustified”. This is from its chair, Angela Madden.
The authorities has at the moment made an unprecedented political option to ignore the clear suggestions of an impartial watchdog which ordered ministers urgently to compensate Waspi ladies 9 months in the past.
This is a weird and completely unjustified transfer which can go away everybody asking what the purpose of an ombudsman is that if ministers can merely ignore their selections. It appears like a call that may make the likes of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump blush.
The concept that an ‘action plan’ to keep away from such errors in future ought to be the results of a six-year ombudsman’s investigation is an insult each to the ladies and to the PHSO [Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman] course of.
An overwhelming majority of MPs again Waspi’s requires truthful compensation and all choices stay on the desk. Parliament should now search another mechanism to power this difficulty on to the order paper so justice could be carried out.
What Kendall instructed MPs about why authorities ignoring Waspi ladies compensation advice
Here are extra quotes from Liz Kendall’s statement to MPs saying the federal government gained’t settle for the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s advice on compensation for Waspi ladies.
-
Kendall mentioned the ombudsman’s report didn’t criticise the choice in 1995 to extend the state pension age for girls, or the coalition’s choice in 2011 to speed up that enhance. The report coated as an alternative complaints in regards to the Department for Work and Pensions not correctly warning ladies in regards to the enhance, she mentioned. Decisions made between 2005 and 2007 led to a 28-month delay in warning letters being despatched to ladies born within the Fifties. The report mentioned that didn’t outcome within the ladies struggling direct monetary misplaced. But, Kendall instructed MPs, it was maladministration in line with the report.
[The report] references analysis from 2004 exhibiting 43% of ladies aged over 60 had been conscious of their state pension age. But it doesn’t sufficiently sufficiently recognise proof from the identical analysis that 73% of ladies aged 45 to 54 had been conscious that the state pension age was rising – the very group that covers ladies born within the Fifties. Or analysis from 2006 that 90% of ladies aged 45 to 54 had been conscious that the state pension age was rising.
Research given to the ombudsman exhibits solely round 1 / 4 of people who find themselves despatched unsolicited letters really bear in mind receiving them or studying them. So we can not settle for that within the nice majority of circumstances sending a letter earlier would have affected whether or not ladies knew their state pension age was rising or would have elevated their alternatives to make knowledgeable selections.
These two details – that the majority ladies knew the state pension age was rising and that letters aren’t as vital because the Ombudsman says – in addition to different causes have knowledgeable our conclusion that there ought to be no scheme of economic compensation to Fifties-born ladies in response to the ombudsman’s report.
-
And she mentioned paying a flat charge of compensation, as beneficial by the ombudsman, wouldn’t be can be “a fair or proportionate use of taxpayers money”.
First, we need to work with the ombudsman to develop an in depth motion plan out of the report, so each and all classes are learnt.
Second, we’re dedicated to setting clear and adequate discover of any modifications within the state pension age so folks can correctly plan for his or her retirement.
And third, I’ve tasked officers to develop a technique for efficient, well timed and trendy communication on the state pension that makes use of the freshest strategies.
Liz Kendall tells MPs Waspi ladies will not get compensation, regardless of ombudsman saying they need to
In March the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman revealed a report saying that the so-called Waspi ladies (Women Against State Pension Inequality) deserved compensation as a result of they didn’t get enough warning from the federal government about the truth that their state pension age was going up. It mentioned folks affected ought to be paid compensation, and that this might value as much as £10.5bn.
At the time the Conservatives, who had been then in authorities, and Labour, who had been anticipating to switch them inside months, refused to decide to accepting the advice. But the then authorities mentioned it could take time to think about the report correctly, and Labour additionally delay a definitive response.
In a press release to the Commons, Liz Kendall has now delivered the federal government’s formal response. And she has dominated out paying compensation.
She instructed MPs:
Given the overwhelming majority of ladies knew the state pension age was rising, the federal government doesn’t imagine paying a flat charge to all ladies at a price of as much as £10.5bn can be a good or proportionate use of taxpayers cash, not least when the earlier authorities didn’t put aside a single penny for any compensation scheme, and after they left us a £22bn within the public funds.
This has been an especially tough choice to take, however we imagine it’s the proper plan of action, and we’re decided to study all the teachings to make sure one of these maladministration by no means occurs once more.
David Gauke, the Conservative former justice secretary, has written an interesting assessment of Kemi Badenoch’s begin as Tory chief for the New Statesman. He has by no means been an fanatic for her model of rightwing politics, however he’s an astute commentator and so his insights are price passing on. He thinks she has had “an underwhelming but not disastrous start”. In specific, he claims she is just not establishing a great relationship with colleagues.
Talking to Conservative MPs, the considerations about her dealing with of colleagues haven’t abated. She is described as “distant” and “not engaging”. “She turns up to vote at the last moment, rushes through with one of her friends and doesn’t speak to anyone else,” says one MP. Another says, “She can’t even bring herself to make eye contact with and say, ‘Hello’ to people she dislikes.” Her crew of shut advisers are considered as not offering adequate problem to her.
These are issues – maybe pushed by shyness greater than the rest – that may be overcome. There isn’t any signal {that a} coup is imminent, however she ought to be cautious. One have a look at the vary of topics past his transient on which Robert Jenrick posts on X means that the runner-up within the final Tory management race has not deserted his ambitions.
Gauke is now main a overview of sentencing coverage for the Labour authorities.
The Liberal Democrats have claimed that the additional funding for police introduced by the Home Office at the moment (see ) is just not as beneficiant because it seems. (See 11.04am.) They clarify:
Of the £986.8m of additional funding for police introduced at the moment within the provisional police grant report (England and Wales) 2025-26, round 1 / 4 or £230.3m is simply to cowl the federal government’s nationwide insurance coverage tax rise. Another £329.8m relies on further council tax, and assumes that each one police and crime commissioners will increase their principle by the utmost permitted of £14 for band D.
This means the additional authorities money to forces is simply £426.8m – half the quantity the Home Office is claiming.
Lisa Smart, the Lib Dem residence affairs spokesperson, mentioned:
Years of failure and ineffective resourcing from the earlier Conservative authorities decimated neighbourhood policing – taking officers off our streets and leaving our communities far much less protected.
The authorities ought to be stepping as much as repair this by correctly funding the officers our communities want – not passing the buck to native police chiefs to place up folks’s council tax as an alternative.
Post Office compensation programme to be prolonged to cowl folks affected by flaws with Nineties Capture IT system
Jonathan Reynolds, the enterprise secretary, has introduced that the scope of the compensation programme for victims of the Post Office scandal will probably be prolonged to cowl earlier potential victims.
The authorities already has four schemes in place providing compensation to put up officer operators who suffered as a result of defective Horizon IT software program led to them being wrongly blamed for lacking cash. More than 900 folks had been prosecuted, greater than 100 had been jailed, however many extra misplaced out as a result of they had been compelled to repay cash they had been accused of shedding or stealing, and/or as a result of they misplaced their jobs.
The Horizon system was launched in 1999. But there have been suspicions that comparable flaws existed with the Capture IT accounting system utilized by the Post Office within the Nineties earlier than Horizon was rolled out. In September the federal government revealed a report by the consultants Kroll saying there was “a reasonable likelihood that Capture could have created shortfalls for subpostmasters”.
Today the Department for Business and Trade has revealed its reponse. It says it’s extending its compensation supply to bear in mind the Kroll conclusions. Several put up workplace operators raised issues with Capture on the time, it says, but it surely doesn’t put a determine on how many individuals may be eligible for compensation and it says a few of these affected may have died.
A major period of time has additionally handed, and we recognise that which means that timescales are far better, and the inhabitants of postmasters that used Capture will probably be extra superior in age, or a better proportion of the inhabitants might have sadly died. We additionally recognise that the passage of time signifies that proof of shortfalls and consequential losses, and proof regarding suspensions, termination, prosecution, or convictions, will probably be far harder to seek out. It will subsequently be tough for claimants to corroborate their claims with up to date proof. Postmasters, the Post Office, or the UK authorities might not have sufficient proof, and we might by no means discover sufficient proof to find out legal responsibility to the extent that may be anticipated by the courts.
In a news release, Reynolds says:
It is due to testimony of postmasters that this has been dropped at gentle and failings have been found.
We should now work shortly to supply redress and justice to those that have suffered significantly after being wrongly accused.
I’d wish to encourage anybody who believes they’ve been affected by Capture to share their story with us so we are able to put wrongs to proper as soon as and for all.
Gareth Thomas, the Post Office minister, says that particulars of how compensation will probably be paid to individuals who suffered because of flaws with Capture will probably be labored over over the approaching months. He explains:
We are contemplating the best type of redress for victims who’ve suffered.
This is a difficult train given the passage of time and the numerous lack of information and proof.
Our proposals will probably be developed via partaking with postmasters and authorized representatives.
Over the approaching months, we need to decide the scope of the monetary redress and the eligibility standards in order that we are able to deliver closure to the impacted postmasters.
Sibling eligibility for contaminated blood compensation funds prolonged
The first few victims of the contaminated blood scandal have acquired their last compensation pay outs, PA Media reviews. And eligibility standards permitting siblings to get compensation have been prolonged. PA says:
Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds mentioned that these whose brothers or sisters had been contaminated with probably lethal viruses whereas receiving care ought to be pretty compensated.
He additionally introduced in a written ministerial statement that the federal government “accepts in full or accepts in principle” all the 12 suggestions made as a part of the Infected Blood Inquiry.
More than 30,000 folks got contaminated blood, or contaminated blood merchandise, between the Nineteen Seventies and early Nineties whereas present process NHS care.
Some 3,000 folks died consequently and survivors reside with lifelong well being implications.
Last week, the federal government introduced that 10 folks have been provided compensation totalling greater than £13m.
Starmer declares additional £35m in emergency help for Ukraine to assist it restore its vitality grid
Keir Starmer has introduced £35m in emergency help for Ukraine to assist it restore its vitality grid.
In an announcement launched as Starmer was attending the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) chief’s summit in Estonia, Downing Street additionally unveiled contemporary sanctions in opposition to the “shadow fleet” of oil tankers utilized by Russia to promote its oil. No 10 mentioned:
The UK has offered £35m of emergency help to assist Ukraine restore its vitality grid and help probably the most weak via a 3rd winter of conflict, the prime minister has introduced at the moment.
It comes because the UK additionally reinforces its iron-clad help for Ukraine by launching contemporary sanctions focusing on Russia’s vitality sector. Today’s sanctions goal 20 shadow fleet ships carrying illicit Russian oil, together with Ocean Faye, Andaman Skies and Mianzimu, which have every carried greater than 4 million barrels of Russian oil in 2024.
Key lynchpins in enabling the buying and selling of Putin’s treasured oil, 2Rivers DMCC and 2Rivers PTE LTD have additionally been slapped with sanctions. These new measures will additional drain Putin’s conflict chest, by clamping down on the oil revenues he so desperately must gas his unlawful conflict and put those that allow Russia’s oil exports on discover.
And Starmer mentioned:
As Putin’s oil revenues proceed to gas the fires of his unlawful conflict, Ukrainian households are enduring chilly, darkish nights, usually with out heating, gentle or electrical energy, focused by Russia’s relentless missile assaults.
But these systematic assaults on Ukraine’s infrastructure won’t grind Ukraine down. It will solely deepen our resolve and help.
Lisa Nandy appoints Margaret Hodge to steer overview of Arts Council, to cease tradition being ‘protect of privileged few’
Margaret Hodge, the previous Labour minister and former chair of the Commons public accounts committee, stood down as an MP on the election. But it appears to be like as if she has by no means been busier. Now within the House of Lords, final week she was appointed as the government’s anti-corruption champion. And at the moment Lisa Nandy, the tradition secretary, has introduced that Hodge will lead an impartial overview into Arts Council England. In a Commons written statement, Nandy says:
This authorities will be certain that the humanities and tradition will not be the protect of a privileged few. We may even place arts and tradition on the coronary heart of our plan for change to ship progress and break down the limitations to alternative throughout the nation. This overview will be certain that Arts Council England is greatest positioned to assist ship this and efficiently steward our cultural and inventive sectors in each a part of England, serving to to rebuild Britain in a decade of nationwide renewal.
Police in England and Wales to get actual phrases funding enhance of three.5%, Home Office says
Police forces in England and Wales will obtain an actual phrases funding enhance of three.5% in 2025-26, the Home Office has introduced. PA Media reviews:
In a written statement, Diana Johnson, the policing minister, mentioned the 2025-26 settlement will quantity to £17.4bn, a rise of as much as £986.9m on the present yr.
The extra funding will cowl the prices of the pay rises given to officers, the rise in employers’ nationwide insurance coverage contributions (NICs) and in addition pay for recruitment to assist meet the federal government’s neighbourhood policing guarantees.
The whole quantity going into policing, together with the cash to forces together with “wider system funding” will probably be £19.5bn, a £1bn enhance, representing an total 3% actual phrases rise.
And Johnson mentioned:
Of the £986.9m of extra funding for police forces, I can verify that £657.1m of this is a rise to authorities grants, which incorporates a rise within the core grants of £339m to make sure police forces are absolutely outfitted to ship our safer streets mission.
This additionally consists of £230.3m to compensate territorial forces for the prices of the change to the employer nationwide insurance coverage contributions from 2025-26, and an extra £100m to kickstart the primary section of 13,000 extra law enforcement officials, PCSOs and particular constables into neighbourhood policing roles. This will present policing with the funding required to sort out crime and maintain communities protected.
Chinese embassy says British MPs ought to ‘cease creating hassle’ and ‘cease anti-China political manipulations’
The Chinese embassy within the UK has instructed British MPs to “immediately stop creating trouble” and “stop anti-China political manipulations”.
In a statement released this morning on its website, in response to Yang Tengbo being named yesterday because the alleged Chinese “spy” who befriended Prince Andrew, an embassy spokesperson that “anti-China clamours made by a handful of UK MPs” had “revealed their twisted mentality towards China”. The spokesperson accused them of attempting to “smear China” and “undermine normal personnel exchanges between China and the UK”.
Here is the assertion.
As for the anti-China clamours made by a handful of UK MPs, they’ve carried out nothing however absolutely revealed their twisted mentality in direction of China, in addition to their vanity and shamelessness. This is a typical case of a thief crying “catch thief”. What they’re actually as much as is to smear China, goal in opposition to the Chinese group within the UK and undermine regular personnel exchanges between China and the UK. We strongly condemn this.
I have to level out that the CPC [Chinese Communist Party] and the Chinese authorities uphold that international locations ought to pursue friendship and cooperation on the idea of mutual respect for one another’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, non-interference in one another’s inner affairs, equality and mutual profit. This is what now we have been saying and what now we have been doing. This can also be why China has so many pals world wide …
We urge the UK facet to instantly cease creating hassle, cease anti-China political manipulations, and cease undermining regular personnel exchanges between China and the UK.
In the Commons yesterday Iain Duncan Smith, the previous Conservative chief, was notably crucial of the United Front Work Department, a Chinese intelligence gathering unit. Duncan Smith mentioned: “The intelligence and security committee report last year said [the UFWD] had penetrated ‘every sector’ of the UK economy, including by spying, stealing intellectual property, influencing, and shaping our institutions.”
But in at the moment’s assertion the embassy spokesperson defended the UFWD. The spokesperson mentioned.
I additionally need to reiterate that theUnited Front led by the CPC endeavours to deliver collectively varied political events and folks from all walks of life, ethnic teams and organisations to advertise cooperation between the CPC and people who find themselves not members of it and promote people-to-people exchanges and friendship with different international locations. This is above-board and past reproach. Though some UK politicians tried to demonise China’s United Front work, they’re doomed to fail.
We all the time imagine {that a} sound and steady China-UK relationship is just not a one-sided favour however what meets the frequent pursuits of each side. The UK facet will need to have a proper notion of China, see the historic pattern clearly, and deal with its relations with China on the idea of mutual respect, non-interference in one another’s inner affairs, equality and mutual profit.
Former first minister Humza Yousaf says he’ll step down from Scottish parliament at subsequent election
Humza Yousaf, the previous Scottish first minister, has introduced that he’ll stand down as an MSP on the subsequent Holyrood election, in 2026.
In a letter to present first minister John Swinney, Yousaf mentioned he will probably be campaigning arduous for the SNP on the subsequent election however won’t run himself. He mentioned:
Come 2026, I’ll have served 15 years as an MSP, 12 of these years as a minister within the Scottish authorities.
The subsequent Scottish parliament elections in 2026 would be the proper time for me to maneuver on, to supply a chance for the subsequent technology of MSPs to step ahead, and to discover the place I can greatest make a contribution sooner or later in serving to to sort out a number of the most urgent challenges our world faces.
Yousaf mentioned that he hoped his time as first minister had been an inspiration to others.
It is usually mentioned that you just can’t be what you can’t see. I hope by by turning into the primary first minister of color, and first Muslim chief of a Western democratic nation, I’ve despatched a transparent message to each younger individual, of any background, who aspires to become involved in public service, that you just do belong and are simply as deserving of alternative as all people else.
And he mentioned that, though he had made errors, he felt he had all the time handled folks with respect.
When one chapter begins to shut, you usually spend time reflecting in your achievements, errors and even regrets – I’ve all three. However, I hope that all through all of it, I used to be in a position to deal with folks with kindness, courtesy and respect.
He has posted the total letter on social media.
In a response, Swinney mentioned:
I’m sorry to see @HumzaYousaf stepping down @ScotParl. He has been a pioneer in Scottish politics. I worth all he has contributed to @scotgov and @theSNP and sit up for his continued involvement. I want Humza, Nadia and their household a lot peace collectively
The Post Office Horizon IT inquiry is listening to closing submissions from counsel at the moment. Lawyers representing (so as) the Post Office, Paula Vennells, Fujitsu, Gareth Jenkins, and the Department for Business and Trade are all talking, they usually have been allotted an hour every.
The listening to began at 9.30am. There is a dwell feed right here.
Phillipson says authorities has ‘no plans’ to ban smacking in England regardless of hints Sara Sharif case prompting rethink
Good morning. The children’s wellbeing and schools bill is being revealed at the moment and, as Sally Weale reviews, it would set out plans to tighten checks on youngsters being educated at residence in England.
Publication coincides with the sentencing of the killers of 10-year-old Sara Sharif – her father and step-mother – following a trial that exposed particulars of one of the surprising circumstances of kid cruelty heard by a British court docket in years. Sara was taken out of faculty, and educated at residence within the months earlier than her loss of life, regardless that lecturers had began to note proof that she was being assaulted at residence, and so the laws – though deliberate properly earlier than the trial – does deal with one among safeguarding loopholes the Sharif case has highlighted.
Bridget Phillipson, the schooling secretary, has been giving interviews this morning. She instructed the Today programme:
Too many youngsters have been failed by the state lately, it’s clear that motion is required. So no extra classes discovered, no extra phrases. Today we set out our plans to be sure that these companies are working collectively and that now we have a lot better visibility of the place youngsters are and what they’re experiencing of their lives.
But in interviews Phillipson has additionally mentioned the federal government doesn’t plan to legislate to ban smacking youngsters in England – regardless that it’s banned in Scotland and Wales, and regardless that the federal government indicated within the autumn a rethink was on the playing cards.
In 2022, as opposition chief, Keir Starmer mentioned he wish to see the ban extended to England. In October, after the Sara Sharif muder trial opened, Dame Rachel de Souza, the kids’s commissioner, said that “a ban on smacking is a necessary step to keep children safe and to stop lower level violence from escalating” and on the time the Department for Education said: “We are looking closely at the legal changes made in Wales and Scotland as we consider whether there is any more we could do in this area.” Last week, after the verdicts had been delivered within the Sharif trial, de Souza said:
What haunts me probably the most about Sara’s loss of life is that her father used the phrases ‘I legally punished my child’, believing this to be a defence to homicide. It is unthinkable that any father or mother or carer may disguise behind our authorized system to justify such cruelty – and but, youngsters residing in England at the moment have much less safety from assault than adults.
Yet at the moment Phillipson has mentioned that the federal government nonetheless has “no plans” to behave on this. She instructed LBC:
We’re not desiring to legislate round this. I do need to have a look at the expertise in Wales and Scotland the place they’ve legislated to know what the impact has been.
And, requested why the federal government is just not implementing a ban in England, she instructed Times Radio:
Because what I need to perceive is the affect and the impact of the laws in Wales. They will probably be setting out the primary spherical of a overview into the implications and impact of the laws that that they had launched. I wish to see that, wish to perceive it, and to resolve then whether or not it’s essential to take additional measures right here in England.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Keir Starmer has been having a breakfast assembly with enterprise leaders in Estonia. Later he’s attending the Joint Expeditionary Force summit, after which visiting British forces close to the border with Russia.
9.30am: The Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry hears closing statements from counsel representing the Post Office, Paula Vennells, Fujitsu, Gareth Jenkins, and the Department for Business and Trade.
10.30am: Charles Clarke, the previous Labour residence secretary, and Michael Gove, the previous Conservative justice secretary, give proof on prisons to the Lords justice and residential affairs committee.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a foyer briefing.
11.30am: Ed Miliband, the vitality secretary, takes questions within the Commons.
Early afternoon (in all probability): The Home Office publishes a written ministerial assertion with particulars of funding for police forces in England and Wales in 2025-26.
2.30pm: Yvette Cooper, the house secretary, provides proof to the Commons residence affairs committee (which for a few years she used to chair).
2.30pm: Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, provides proof to the Commons justice committee.
If you need to contact me, please put up a message beneath the road or message me on social media. I can’t learn all of the messages BTL, however when you put “Andrew” in a message geared toward me, I’m extra more likely to see it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase.
If you need to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of social media. You can attain me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X however particular person Guardian journalists are there, I’ve nonetheless have my account, and when you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I’ll see it and reply if mandatory.
I discover it very useful when readers level out errors, even minor typos. No error is just too small to appropriate. And I discover your questions very fascinating too. I can’t promise to answer to all of them, however I’ll attempt to reply to as many as I can, both BTL or typically within the weblog.