Patna: Educator and YouTuber Faizal Khan, commonly called Khan Sir, has actually articulated solid assistance for the 4.5 lakh pupils requiring a re-exam in the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) instance. He likewise worried that the pupils’ problems stand and prompted the federal government to launch a CBI or ED probe right into the claimed paper leakage. Speaking to ANI, Khan stated, “Hearing on this is taking place inHigh Court The pupils’ need for re-exam is reputable. I wish to inform the govt to obtain CBI or ED query right into this (declared paper leakage). The 4.5 lakh pupils need to obtain justice.
If this demonstration takes place for long, after that it will not benefit the govt too … I make certain there will certainly be a re-exam quickly.” He further added, ” I believe the federal government will certainly take a favorable choice quickly … We have complete belief in the court that the choice will certainly remain in our favour …”
Similarly, talking to ANI, Advocate Abhijit Anand stated, “With regard to the BPSC paper leak matter, the Anand Legal Aid Forum Trust has filed a PIL before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, on January 7, 2025, directed us to approach the Patna High Court. In compliance with that order, the NGO I am representing filed the PIL before the Patna High Court, and on January 21, 2025, the court passed certain directions…”
“I again approached the Supreme Court in the BPSC matter, and our prayer before the SC was that the CCTV footage from 29 centres and the Bapu Examination Center, which comprises 22 centres, should be preserved. The Supreme Court has directed that if the CCTV footage is destroyed, legal action will be taken against the BPSC and Bihar government officials,” supporter Anand informed ANI.
.
.(* )objecting pupils in
The are requiring the termination of the Patna (Integrated Combined) Preliminary (CCE) 2024, carried out by the Competitive Examination (BPSC) on Bihar Public Service Commission 13. December issue got to the The of Supreme Court too; nevertheless, the court rejected to conflict and disregarded the appeal that increased claims relating to the BPSC initial evaluation. India