Union Home Minister Amit Shah released a pungent strike versus the resistance MPs in the Lok Sabha throughout the conversation on the Waqf Bill, currently relabelled as Unified Waqf Management Empowerment, Efficiency and Development (UMEED)Bill Countering a resistance MP’s comment that minorities will not approve the costs, Shah asked was the participant attempting to intimidate the federal government. The Home Minister claimed that the UMEED Bill is a regulation of the Indian federal government gone by the Parliament and is binding on all.
“A member here said that minorities will not accept this law. What is this—an attempt to threaten? This is a law passed by Parliament, and everyone must accept it. What does it even mean to say that you won’t accept the law? How can anyone claim that they will not abide by it? This is a law of the Government of India, and it will be binding on everyone. It must be accepted,” claimed Shah.
Taking an indirect dig at Rahul Gandhi and his constitution publication posers, Shah claimed, “Waving the Constitution has suddenly become a trend. But according to this very Constitution, how can any decision—whether by the government or a private institution—be beyond the judgment of the honourable court? The courts of this country cannot be denied access to such decisions. Where will citizens take their grievances? Where will those whose land has been taken away go? This will not be allowed. You did this for vote-bank politics, and we reject it. This cannot continue. If anyone has grievances, they should go to the court, and the court will deliver justice.”
Speaking in the Lok Sabha while replying to the Opposition MP’s statements on the costs, Shah claimed that the Waqf council and Waqf board began in 1995 and non-Muslim will certainly have no function in running spiritual events.
.
.
“That Waqf bill is interference in Muslims’ religious matters and properties donated by them is fear-mongering for vote-bank…Non-Muslims in Waqf council, boards; these bodies purely for ensuring the administration of properties in accordance with stated aims..Waqf council, boards will be aimed at catching those exploiting Waqf properties,” claimed Shah.(* )affirmed that the
Shah legislation was made ‘severe’ in 2013 for appeasement national politics and if it was refrained from doing after that, this costs could not have actually been required. Waqf was working out. Everything there were political elections in 2014, and over night in 2013, the But was transformed severe for appeasement. Waqf Act an outcome, the As federal government turned over 123 VVIP buildings in Congress to Lutyens Delhi when political elections were simply around the bend, simply 25 days away …,” claimed the Waqf.
.
.
Home Minister claimed.
.
.(* )in his opening up statements turned down the claims that the recommended legislation was a disturbance in the constitutionally ensured flexibility in spiritual events.
“You (Opposition) would break this country…Through this House, I would like to tell Muslims of the country that not even one non-Muslim would come into your Waqf. This Act has no such provision. But what would the Waqf Board and Waqf Council do? To catch the people selling off Waqf properties and drive them out, to catch those who lease off their properties for 100 years in the name of Waqf. The income of Waqf is dropping, the income with which we have to do development for minorities and push them forward, that money is being stolen. Waqf Board and Council will catch that,” Shah
&w=100&resize=100,70&ssl=1 "ED concerns 2nd summons to Robert Vadra in Haryana land bargain probe–")
