The Supreme Court on Tuesday remained the death penalty of a 30-year-old guy founded guilty of the rape and murder of a 19-year-old design pupil in Jharkhand’s funding Ranchi.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Pankaj Mithal and Ujjal Bhuyan mobilized the equated duplicate of the high court and the high court documents founding guilty and granting death penalty to Rahul Kumar.
“Death sentence awarded shall remain stayed. The registry to acquisition records from the trial court and the high court along with the soft copy,” guided the bench.
On September 9, the Jharkhand High Court validated the high court’s death penalty to Kumar pen names Rahul Raj, that comes from Nawada area in Bihar.
Aggrieved by the high court order, Kumar relocated the leading court, which as an issue of technique on the very first day of a death penalty request hearing, remained the implementation of the death sentence and mobilized the documents from the secondary courts.
The murder of the girl, that was raped, suffocated and after that lit, happened on December 15, 2016. A high court granted death sentence to Kumar in December, 2019.
The high court in its order stated, “Life of a bright young girl aged 19 years who was studying in an engineering college, was snuffed out in a most barbaric manner… is established by the post mortem examination report duly proved by the doctors who formed the medical board to conduct the autopsy over the dead body of the victim.”
Terming the criminal offense as a “horrendous act” by the applicant the high court validated the death sentence granted by the high court under Section 302 of the IPC.
The high court better stated Kumar had actually come prepared with a wire cord and an electrical cord to strangulate the target besides lubricating substance oil to establish her ablaze after the case.
“Strangulation was so intense that cable cord and electric wire got embedded in the neck of the victim. Thereafter, he poured lubricant oil over the body and set her on fire. All this was done on a helpless victim, by this appellant with whom the victim had no past enmity, and after the act, he simply slipped out and absconded,” it stated.
The message mortem record developed “violent rape with the victim” and strangling her to fatality, the high court stated.
“This is not a case where crime was the outcome of sudden spurt of passion, but was diabolically planned and ruthlessly executed. Evidence discloses that appellant stalked the deceased, attempted to take a room on rent in her house, and thereafter, stayed in a room in a nearby temple complex…” the court stated.
This tale has actually been sourced from a 3rd party syndicated feed, companies. Mid- day approves no obligation or responsibility for its reliability, credibility, integrity and information of the message. Mid- day management/mid-day. com gets the single right to modify, erase or get rid of (without notification) the material in its outright discernment for any type of factor whatsoever
