West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday attended to over 10,000 Imams and participants of the Muslim area at the Netaji Indoor Stadium inKolkata The occasion was an Imam Conference, where Mamata promoted 46 mins concentrating mostly on resistance to the Waqf Amendment Act.
In today’s episode of DNA, Rahul Sinha evaluations Mamata Banerjee’s Hindu-Muslim speech in the middle of the exodus of Hindus in Murshidabad.
In her speech, Banerjee pointed out the Constitution 25 times, utilized words ‘Hindu’ 20 times, ‘Muslim’ 17 times, and ‘Waqf’ 16 times. She claimed ‘peace’ 13 times and ‘riot’ 12 times. However, Chandan Das and Hargobind Das, both eliminated in the current Murshidabad physical violence, were not pointed out up until the last min of her speech.
SEE Full Episode Here:
.
‘-‘
.”” DNA
.”(
*) LIVE#DNA(* ) .Rahul Sinha( @#ZeeLive #ZeeNews #DNAWithRahulSinha #MamataBanerjee @RahulSinhaTV https://t.co/YcLOtDPHmd )Zee News centimeters did not discuss theZeeNews cops, which were charged of passivity throughout the troubles.April 16, 2025
The, she took objective at the BSF, which was released inBengal to recover order.However pointed out the BSF 7 times, doubting their duty, despite the fact that citizens state the BSF restored tranquility after 72 hours of physical violence.Murshidabad mentioned Mamata Banerjee 5 times, however just briefly described the physical violence in
Banerjee Bangladesh claimed absolutely nothing regarding sufferers like(* ), that shed 5 lakh in cost savings to arson, orMurshidabad, whose 2 lakh conserved for her spouse s therapy was robbed. She did she point out(* ), whose home and research study notes were refuted. Sumitra Ghosh was planning for the SSC test. . . Rita, she asked for objections versus the Nor legislation, claiming, Shubhankar conjured up leaders likeHe,
Instead,Waqf,‘Dilli Chalo.’ She,Tagore, andAmbedkar Gandhi, she did not condemn those that transformed objections fierce.
.
.
Bose in the 45th min of her speech did she introduce 10 lakh settlement for the households of those eliminated in the Azad troubles. Iqbal households of the sufferers informedYet,
Only claimed the only feeling of security comes
from the BSF camp yetMurshidabad is targeting the BSF rather than the rioters.
.
.(* ), UP But had actually offered his handle troubles in simply 46 secs.Zee News utilized component of her 46-minute speech to react.“We don’t want money. We want security.” They that,Mamata Banerjee started trending on social media sites in
Meanwhile
.
.(* )A contrast of both states
likewise questions. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has actually led Mamata for 14 years.(* )has actually been UP centimeters for 8 years.After NCRB information programsYogi s criminal activity price versus females in 2022 was 71.8 per lakh females, while in UP it
was 58.6.
.
.Bengal instances in
mored than 8 per lakh, contrasted to 7 in UP. Mamata likewise saw almost 3 times a lot more deadly assaults than UP. Bengal to murder instances stood at 12.4% in(* ), while in UP it was simply 1.6 %.(* )did much better in chargesheet declaring with a 90% price contrasted to 79 % in UP. . . Yogi the financial front,But s per capita earnings increased from 91,000 in 2017 18 to 1.54 lakh in 2023 24. UP went from 58,000 to 93,000 in the exact same duration.Bengal UP s populace mores than 24 crore, greater than dual
Kidnapping s.
.
. Bengal UP adds 8.5% to(* )s GDP, whileBengal includes 5.5 %.(* )2019 and Attempt 2024, UP got 15,200 crore in FDI, contrasted to Bengal s 13,945 crore.Bengal to (* )2024 alone, UP brought in 2,585 crore.
On didn t function in the leading 10. . . Bengal physical violence, activated by objections versus theBut legislation, brought about BSF implementation on Bengal orders.
concern likewise got to the India onBengal . . Between October A three-judge bench led by December DYBengal listened to requests testing theFrom April December attorneys Bengal,
The Murshidabad, and Waqf opposed
the legislation.
Calcutta High Court stood for theThe
.
.Supreme Court court increased crucial concerns regarding’ Wednesday by individual ‘an arrangement that permits spiritual building cases without sale acts.
bench asked, Chief Justice cautioned that turning downChandrachud cases can cause conflicts. . . Waqf Amendment Act asked whether residential properties currently identified as Senior can currently be gotten rid of. Kapil Sibal made clear that signed upRajeev Dhavan residential properties would certainly stay unblemished.Abhishek Manu Singhvi asserted almost 4 lakh of 8 lakh Solicitor General Tushar Mehta residential properties may be shed under the brand-new legislation. Centre kept in mind,
The
.
. Waqf condemned physical violence over the The legislation, claiming such acts must not take place while the issue is sub judice.
“How will centuries-old religious properties be registered without documents?” It bench likewise asked the Waqf whether
Justice Khanna can be admitted(* )spiritual counts on. . . Waqf court might pass an acting order on 3 crucial concerns on Mehta.Waqf
