ChatGPT leakages individual details: Woman asks AI concerning her plant, obtains surprised with reaction, ‘Scariest thing seen’

ChatGPT, the generative fabricated modern technology that just recently made waves online for Ghibli– design photos, remains in the information once again, however this moment for wrong outcome. A surprising reaction was produced when an individual asked ChatGPT what was incorrect with her plant. The frightening reaction the individual obtained was another person’s individual information.

Suggesting it to be the “scariest thing” she saw AI do, in a LinkedIn blog post, she mentioned, “I uploaded a few pics of my Sundari (peacock plant) on ChatGPT—just wanted help figuring out why her leaves were turning yellow.” Revealing that rather than offering plant treatment guidance, ChatGPT gave her with another person’s individual information. The reaction produced, “Mr. Chirag’s full CV. His CA student registration number. His principal’s name and ICAI membership number. And confidently called it Strategic Management notes.”

Narrating the painful experience, Chartered Accountant Pruthvi Mehta in her blog post included, “I just wanted to save a dying leaf. Not accidentally download someone’s entire career. It was funny for like 3 seconds—until I realised this is someone’s personal data.”

Questing the overuse of AI modern technology, this blog post is doing the rounds on social networks and has actually accumulated over 900 responses and numerous remarks. Claiming it to be a counter response of ChatGPT, as a result of overuse for Ghibli Art, she presented the inquiry, “Can we still keep Faith on AI.”

Check netizen’s responses below

Strong responses from net individuals gathered as an individual mentioned, “I am sure the data is made up and incorrect! Pruthvi.” Another individual commented, “This is surprising since the prompt asked something entirely different.”

A 3rd individual composed, “Wondering if these are real details of someone, or it’s just fabricated it. Nevertheless, seems a bit concerning, but looks more like a bug in their algorithms.” A 4th individual responded, “I don’t see this as possible unless the whole chat thread has something in the link with this.”