.
.
Another chaotic batting efficiency from India’s celebrities in the 3rd Test versus New Zelanad left experts scraping their heads. Be it Virat Kohli’s disastrous run-out on Day 1 of the Mumbai Test or Sarfaraz Khan’s batting placement, there were numerous debate-stirring events in the initial innings. After India rode on Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant’s dazzling efficiency on Saturday, a strange choice from captain Rohit Sharma and instructor Gautam Gambhir activated an extreme argument on social networks. Sarfaraz appeared to bat at theNo 8 placement for India, leaving some followers and previous cricketers shocked.
Former India cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar really did not avoid asking hard inquiries to India’s group monitoring, after Sarfaraz was benched in the batting order, at a place where he has Don Brandman- esque states.
“A guy in form, has 3 fifties in his first 3 Tests, gets 150 in the Bangalore Test, a good player of spin, pushed back in the order to keep left & right combination?? Makes no sense. Sarfaraz now walking in at no 8! Poor call by India,” Manjrekar uploaded on X.
.
A man in kind, has 3 fifties in his initial 3 Tests, obtains 150 in the Bangalore Test, an excellent gamer of spin, pressed back in the order to maintain left & & ideal mix?? Makes no feeling. Sarfraz currently strolling in at no 8! Poor phone call by India.
.
— Sanjay Manjrekar (@sanjaymanjrekar) November 2, 2024
Sarfaraz really did not last for long after appearing to bat at theNo 8 place, and was disregarded for a 4-ball duck by Ajaz Patel.
In his last 6 innings at the Wankhede Stadium, Sarfaraz Khan has actually struck a monstrous 601 runs in First Class cricket at approximately 150.25. His last 6 ratings at the location have actually been: 177, 6, 301 *, 44, 21 & & 52 *.
Seeing the similarity Mohammed Siraj (nightwatchman) and Ravindra Jadeja bat in advance of Sarfaraz at the location, for this reason, left numerous followers and cricket specialists frustrated. The suches as of Siraj and Jadeja were disregarded for 0 and 14 specifically.
Topics discussed in this post
