The attraction of momentum investing, with its “buy high, sell higher” mantra, has surged, difficult conventional funding norms. Yet, behind the easy thought lies a fancy mechanism the place fund dimension and buying and selling quantity can enormously affect success. In this area, cautious calibration is crucial, as bigger funds threat distorting costs, whereas area of interest portfolios can higher protect technique integrity.
The volume-momentum nexus
In the area of interest world of momentum investing, quantity performs a pivotal position in figuring out a technique’s effectiveness.
Large asset managers, usually holding substantial money to capitalize on market corrections, face limitations with their sizeable funds. These constraints make it difficult to put money into smaller, much less liquid securities the place momentum thrives, probably lacking key alternatives.
Read this | Meet the champions of momentum investing who beat competitors in post-covid bull market
Specialized momentum methods, particularly area of interest PMS portfolios, method this otherwise, minimizing market affect and sustaining the purity of momentum alerts. Designed to carry full market publicity, these portfolios solely shift to money when market-wide momentum considerably weakens—resembling throughout the Covid-19 disaster—highlighting their resilience in various situations.
Fund dimension additional impacts momentum by influencing market dynamics. Large funds getting into or exiting illiquid positions can distort costs, creating synthetic actions that obscure real momentum alerts. This drawback is heightened in passive momentum funds, which function inside a restricted inventory universe and comply with predictable rebalancing schedules, making them weak to front-running.
Evolution of energetic momentum methods
Active momentum methods have advanced to beat conventional limitations. By increasing the funding universe to 750 or extra shares and adopting month-to-month rebalancing, these methods present distinct benefits. A broader universe permits for extra high-momentum alternatives and higher diversification, whereas month-to-month rebalancing—not like the semi-annual changes of passive funds—permits faster responses to rising tendencies.
And this | Mastering issue investing: Unlocking market secrets and techniques with worth, momentum, and high quality
The power of this method is underscored by latest efficiency: Valtrust’s Momentum PMS achieved returns of 59.1% in 2023 and 42.3% year-to-date in 2024, outpacing the S&P BSE 500 TRI’s 27.4% and 25.6%, respectively. Notably, this technique captures greater good points throughout bullish phases whereas sustaining comparable efficiency in flat or bearish markets.
Portfolio development: An artwork
Crafting a momentum portfolio requires a cautious steadiness. A concentrated collection of about 30 shares, algorithmically ranked by momentum scores, offers optimum diversification with out diluting the technique. This method diverges from passive funds that usually maintain extra shares, which may weaken the momentum impact.
The inventory choice course of is rigorous, filtering the highest 750 shares by market cap via liquidity and governance standards earlier than making use of momentum rankings. This purely bottom-up technique focuses on worth momentum, steering away from subjective sector calls or market timing. Currently, this method has led to concentrated positions in sectors with robust momentum, resembling capital items and monetary providers.
The street forward
Success in momentum investing more and more is dependent upon hanging the suitable steadiness between fund dimension and technique effectiveness. Consistent efficiency requires preserving technique purity via cautious sizing, common rebalancing, and a broad inventory universe. As extra traders flip to momentum alternatives, understanding these subtleties has grow to be important.
Also learn | Look who’s making a comeback: Quality vs worth investing
The rise of momentum-focused PMS choices marks a major shift within the area, offering traders with the twin benefit {of professional} administration and the agility to seize market tendencies. These choices mix institutional-grade evaluation with the pliability to behave on rising alternatives, presenting a compelling different to conventional passive momentum methods.
The authors are Arihant Bardia, CIO and founding father of Valtrust, and Prashant Krishna, chief tehnical analyst at Valtrust.
