By Alexandra Alper
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Nippon Steel’s recommended $14.9 billion requisition of united state Steel would certainly develop nationwide safety dangers since it might injure the supply of steel required for vital transport, facilities, building and farming tasks, the united state claimed in a letter sent out to the business and seen by Reuters.
Decisions by Nippon might “lead to a reduction in domestic steel production capacity,” the Committee on Foreign Investment in the UNITED STATE (CFIUS) claimed in its 17-page letter sent out Saturday to Nippon Steel and UNITED STATE Steel, initially reported by Reuters.
“The consequences to national security that have been identified relate to the possible supply chain disruptions to sectors critical to national security, particularly transportation, infrastructure, construction and agriculture,” the board created.
Nippon Steel informed CFIUS in a letter Tuesday that it will certainly spend billions of bucks to preserve and enhance united state Steel centers that or else would certainly have been idled. Nippon included that the bargain “indisputably will maintain and potentially increase domestic steelmaking capacity in the United States.”
But CFIUS suggested “A continued loss of viable commercial production capabilities and related skilled workforce will jeopardize the U.S. steel industry’s ability to meet the full spectrum of national security requirements.”
The committee, which reviews foreign investments for national security threats, also sees risk arising from Nippon’s growing presence in India, where production costs are much lower than in the U.S.
CFIUS also voiced concerns about Nippon Steel’s policy toward seeking U.S. trade relief for products manufactured domestically. It noted that Nippon sometimes resists such relief for the U.S. domestic steel industry, raising the possibility that U.S. Steel would be less aggressive in seeking trade remedies under Nippon’s control.
Nippon has said it would not transfer any U.S. Steel production capacity or jobs outside the U.S. and would not interfere in any of U.S. Steel’s decisions on trade matters, including decisions to pursue trade measures under U.S. law against unfair trade practices.
Nippon Steel, UNITED STATE Steel, the White House and the Treasury Department, which leads CFIUS, did not promptly react to ask for remark.
Nippon Steel has actually recommended an in-depth draft contract to attend to CFIUS’s problems.
(Additional Reporting by David Shepardson; editing and enhancing by Chris Sanders and David Gregorio)
